Talk:2-FMA: Difference between revisions
>Graatch m source request for an effect |
>Graatch m signing name |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
================== | ================== | ||
It's not that I don't believe it, but can anyone source the "emotionality suppression" effect for me? I find it a bit interesting that it would do that. And this can and ought to be subjective experience reports, since this is not something scientific literature will deal with, at least at this stage of scientific interest in 2-FMA. | It's not that I don't believe it, but can anyone source the "emotionality suppression" effect for me? I find it a bit interesting that it would do that. And this can and ought to be subjective experience reports, since this is not something scientific literature will deal with, at least at this stage of scientific interest in 2-FMA. --[[User:Graatch|Graatch]] ([[User talk:Graatch|talk]]) 05:16, 14 August 2017 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 03:16, 14 August 2017
Dubious claim with bad reference
So, I noticed that this claim was made for both 2-fluorination & 4-fluorination, on the respective pages: "Studies demonstrate that 2-flourine amphetamine substitutions limit activity of the compound at the alpha-1 adrenergic receptor with an over 200-fold increased selectivity for A2 receptors over A1 receptors."
I decided to check the citation to see which one it supported, and realized that it was neither. The little bit about fluorinated norepinephrine is also pretty irrelevant in terms of SAR, so I think it was someone with a vested interest in selling these amphetamines attempting to justify the anecdotal effects / dose ceiling where applicable. I've removed the claim from the pages I noticed it in. Storm (talk) 04:57, 7 March 2017 (CET)
======
It's not that I don't believe it, but can anyone source the "emotionality suppression" effect for me? I find it a bit interesting that it would do that. And this can and ought to be subjective experience reports, since this is not something scientific literature will deal with, at least at this stage of scientific interest in 2-FMA. --Graatch (talk) 05:16, 14 August 2017 (CEST)