Warning
This is an unofficial archive of PsychonautWiki as of 2025-08-11T15:14:44Z. Content on this page may be outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate. Please refer to the original page for the most up-to-date information.

Talk:Subjective effect index

From PsychonautWiki Archive
Revision as of 21:44, 7 September 2017 by >Josikins (updated completed tasks)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tasks for josi's incoming subjective effect index improvement project:

Completed

  • come up with more scientific and legitimate terminologies for the the following components: Exposure to inner mechanics of consciousness Subconscious communication 8B Geometry - Exposure to inner mechanics of consciousness
  • write up identity alteration as an exact component within a subsection on the identity page
  • machinescapes and scenarios shave now been moved into multisensory effects. update their descriptions accordingly!!!
  • collaborate with User:Fishcenternicole to tidy up and improve upon the new shadow people sensory subcomponent subsections
  • rename environmental alterations to object alterations
  • improve or overhaul index intro, note that the descriptions should strive for linguistic simplicity so that as many people as possible can actually understand the effects

Pending

(in order of priority)

  • continue proofreading and improving EVERY SINGLE COMPONENT. Visual, Auditory, Disconnective, Multisensory, Cognitive, Psychological, Physical, Side effects,
  • add visual styles subsection and history/culture subsection for autonomous entities
  • define exactly what constitutes a multisensory effect vs a specific sensory effect for the hallucinatory states category
  • complete the list category pages for the various types of physical effects and side effects. make sure they have comprehensive defintions/introductions
  • fill in all of the red link effects
  • write a universal intro for style variation sections which explain what style variations are
  • mention rarity for the more obscure transpersonal states
  • add as much consistency for descriptions as possible. for example in the first sentence, within introductions to leveling systems, sentences introducing levels themselves, content across inter-related components etc